Last updated: July 2026 (Shrawan 2083). Scheme rules follow each fund’s current provisions — verify details with SSF, EPF and CIT directly.
Nepal has three big retirement/savings vehicles — SSF (सामाजिक सुरक्षा कोष), EPF (कर्मचारी सञ्चय कोष) and CIT (नागरिक लगानी कोष) — and almost everyone mixes them up. Which is mandatory? Can you have all three? Where does a private-sector worker end up versus a government employee? Here’s the clean comparison.
The One-Table Answer
| SSF | EPF | CIT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full name | Social Security Fund | Employees Provident Fund (कर्मचारी सञ्चय कोष) | Citizen Investment Trust (नागरिक लगानी कोष) |
| Mainly serves | Private/formal sector under the Contribution-Based SS Act, plus self-employed, informal & foreign employment | Government & public-sector employees (historically) | Anyone — voluntary savings/investment schemes |
| Nature | Social security: insurance schemes + pension | Provident fund: lump-sum savings | Investment trust: savings/retirement products |
| Mandatory? | For covered employers/workers (details) | For its covered public employees | Voluntary (some schemes used for tax planning) |
| Contribution | 31% of basic (11+20) — breakdown | 10%+10% type PF structure | You choose per scheme |
| Insurance bundled? | Yes — medical, accident, dependent | No (separate provisions) | No (products vary) |
| Pension for life? | Yes — ÷160 formula at 60 (how) | Lump sum focus | Scheme-dependent annuities/payouts |
So Which One Are You In?
- Private company employee: SSF is your system — employer enrollment is the norm under the Act.
- Government employee: EPF historically holds your PF; newer cohorts and reforms shift boundaries — check your appointment terms.
- Anyone wanting extra savings: CIT schemes are open on top of whichever fund you’re in.
Can You Have All Three?
Practically, yes — combinations happen all the time: a private-sector worker in SSF adding voluntary CIT savings; a civil servant in EPF whose side business puts them in SSF as self-employed (guide). What you generally can’t do is have the same single employment doubly enrolled for the same purpose — the employment’s fund follows its governing law.
The Real Differences That Matter
- Insurance: only SSF bundles medical/accident/dependent protection with retirement. EPF/CIT money grows, but protection is your problem.
- Longevity risk: SSF’s lifelong pension continues no matter how long you live; lump sums can run out.
- Liquidity: reversed ranking — CIT most flexible, EPF loans/withdrawals per rules, SSF most locked (by design — what unlocks when).
- Tax: all three enjoy tax advantages within limits; treatment differs by scheme and year — confirm current law.
FAQ
Is SSF the same as सञ्चय कोष?
No. सञ्चय कोष (EPF) is the provident fund historically for public employees; SSF is the contribution-based social security system with insurance + pension, mainly covering the private/formal sector and beyond.
Can a private company choose EPF instead of SSF?
Coverage follows the law, not preference — employers under the SS Act’s mandate belong in SSF (employer guide).
Which gives better returns?
Wrong question — they’re different instruments. SSF = protection + pension floor; EPF = PF savings; CIT = flexible investing. The strong personal-finance answer is usually SSF (or EPF, per your sector) as the base + voluntary extras — model yours on the SSF School Financial Planner.
I moved from government to private job. What happens?
Your EPF stays per its rules; your new employment enrolls in SSF. Both retain your money; they don’t merge.
🤝 आफ्नो fund situation बुझ्न गाह्रो भयो?
कुन fund, कति, किन — SSF School मा tools छन्, अथवा हामीसँग सोध्नुहोस्।
Disclaimer: Digital Solution Nepal is an independent educational/digital-service assistance website, not a government body. Each fund’s current rules govern — SSF/EPF/CIT official sources are final.

